PENSAMENTO COMPUTACIONAL COMO ESTRATÉGIA PARA ELICITAÇÃO DE REQUISITOS EM DOCUMENTOS

Helena Macedo Reis; Maria Fernanda do Prado Tostes; Carolina  Biserra; Fernando Tiosso; Rodrigo Clemente Thom  de Souza

doi:10.31510/infa.v17i2.891

Authors

Helena Macedo Reis Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) – Jandaia do Sul – PR – Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9339-873X
Maria Fernanda do Prado Tostes Universidade Estadual do Paraná (UNESPAR) – Paranavaí – PR - Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8737-0431
Carolina Biserra Universidade Estadual do Paraná (UNESPAR) – Paranavaí – PR - Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2435-8528
Fernando Tiosso Faculdade de Tecnologia (Fatec) – Taquaritinga – SP – Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9344-0747
Rodrigo Clemente Thom de Souza Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) – Jandaia do Sul – PR– Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2435-8528

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31510/infa.v17i2.891

Keywords:

Applied Computing, Interactive Learning Environments, Software Engineering, Requirements Analysis

Abstract

Requirements elicitation is the first step of requirements engineering with the objective of seeking, surveying, elaborating, negotiating, specifying and verifying the services and restrictions of a system. There are several techniques for eliciting requirements, including document analysis. Despite the advantages of elicitation through document analysis, there are some restrictions, such as the lack of data integration and difficulty in detailing the information. To minimize these problems, this study investigated the use of Computational Thinking to support requirements gathering. To verify the proposed strategy, the elicited requirements were validated by four evaluators through the Requirements Review and a Prototype. The results showed that the evaluators considered that the requirements were adequately elicited for the development of applications to support the perioperative post-surgical processes for nursing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Helena Macedo Reis, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) – Jandaia do Sul – PR – Brasil
Maria Fernanda do Prado Tostes, Universidade Estadual do Paraná (UNESPAR) – Paranavaí – PR - Brasil
Carolina Biserra, Universidade Estadual do Paraná (UNESPAR) – Paranavaí – PR - Brasil
Fernando Tiosso, Faculdade de Tecnologia (Fatec) – Taquaritinga – SP – Brasil
Rodrigo Clemente Thom de Souza, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) – Jandaia do Sul – PR– Brasil

References

BOWEN, Glenn A. et al. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, v. 9, n. 2, p. 27, 2009.

DENNIS, Alan; WIXOM, Barabara Haley; ROTH, Roberta. Systems Analysis and Design. John Wiley & Sons, 2018.

O'LEARY, Zina. The essential guide to doing your research project. Sage, 2017.

PRESSMAN, Roger; MAXIM, Bruce. Engenharia de Software-8ª Edição. McGraw Hill Brasil, 2016.

SELBY, Cynthia; WOOLLARD, John. Computational thinking: the developing definition. 2013.

SOBECC-Práticas Recomendadas SOBECC. 2017. Sociedade Brasileira de Enfermeiros de Centro Cirúrgico. Recuperação Anestésica e Centro de Material e Esterilização.

SOMMERVILLE, Ian. Engenharia de Software, 8 edição. Pearson, Addison Wesley, v. 8, n. 9, p. 10, 2011.

SOUZA, Talita Monteiro; CARVALHO, Rachel; PALADINO, Camila Moreira. Diagnósticos, prognósticos e intervenções de enfermagem na sala de recuperação pós-anestésica. Revista SOBECC, v. 17, n. 4, p. 33-47, 2012.

TSUMAKI, Toshihiko; TAMAI, Tetsuo. Framework for matching requirements elicitation techniques to project characteristics. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, v. 11, n. 5, p. 505-519, 2006.

ZIMMERMANN, Jussara et al. Proposta de aplicaçao e avaliaçao de conceitos do Pensamento Computacional em crianças hospitalizadas. In: Anais dos Workshops do Congresso Brasileiro de Informática na Educação. 2016. p. 1249.

ZOWGHI, Didar; COULIN, Chad. Requirements elicitation: A survey of techniques, approaches, and tools. In: Engineering and managing software requirements. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005. p. 19-46.