POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE POINTS IN RELATION TO REMOTE CLASSES
evaluation of experiences in the use of this teaching modality by Higher Education Course in System Analysis and Development students at Fatec Taquaritinga
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31510/infa.v18i2.1204Keywords:
remote classes., teaching., video conferencing platforms., microsoft teams.Abstract
Videoconferencing platforms are becoming more and more popular among students and workers, considerably altering the dynamics of business, teaching and learning. In this way, this study seeks to assess positive and negative points regarding the use of these platforms, especially in relation to the adoption of these systems for offering online classes. For this, it seeks for theoretical studies that justify the growth trend of this teaching modality, trying to understand aspects such as focus, harm and interaction in the use of such technologies. In order to observe these characteristics in practice, the study presents a quantitative survey, in which 100 students from Fatec Taquaritinga System Analysis and Development Technology Course are asked about their experiences in remote classes. What can be seen from this study is that although there are several positive aspects in relation to the adoption of such platforms, the daily class hours, often added to the online workload, present high levels fatigue or wear and tear for many students, not to mention that online interaction and participation do not flow as naturally as in face-to-face classes, which can put students and teachers in certain difficulties in the teaching and learning process. There is, in this sense, a vast path to be explored in order to make online classes more productive and less stressful.
Downloads
References
BAILENSON, Jeremy N. Nonverbal overload: a theorical argument for the causes of Zoom Fatigue. Technology, Mind and Behavior, vol. 2, n. 1, fev. 2021. Disponível em: < https://bit.ly/2UfDQji >. Acesso em: 29 jun. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030
GLOBAL WORKPLACE ANALYTICS. Global Work-From-Home Experience Survey. Global Workplace Analytics, maio 2020. Disponível em: < https://bit.ly/2Ud5WeY >. Acesso em: 29 jun. 2021.
IBGE. Pnad Covid. IBGE, nov. 2020. Disponível em: < https://bit.ly/3heMINW >. Acesso em: 30 jun. 2021.
OPPEZZO, Marily. SCHWARTZ, Daniel L. Give your ideas some legs: the positive effect of walking on creative thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 40, p. 1142–1152, 2014. Disponível em: < https://bit.ly/3dq1HDE >. Acesso em: 30 jun. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036577
OWL LABS. State of Remote Work. Owl Labs, 2020. Disponível em: < https://bit.ly/3hjebhb >. Acesso em: 29 jun. 2021.
SILVEIRA, Daniel. Home office bateu recorde no Brasil em 2018, diz IBGE. G1, 18 dez. 2019. Disponível em: < https://glo.bo/3h0Uxro >. Acesso em: 29 jun. 2021.
ZOOM continua crescendo com aumento de trabalho remoto. G1, 1 set. 2020. Disponível em: < https://glo.bo/35XEvIy >. Acesso em: 30 jun. 2021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Interface Tecnológica

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Os direitos autorais dos artigos publicados pertencem à revista Interface Tecnológica e seguem o padrão Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0), que permite o remixe, adaptação e criação de obras derivadas do original, mesmo para fins comerciais. As novas obras devem conter menção ao(s) autor(es) nos créditos.


.jpg)


1.png)
1.png)